DISCLAIMER: News content on this website is not to be construed as a reflection of the Montana Public Service Commission or Dr.Bukacek PSC, Commissioner Elect's personal opinions or platforms. The news information provided is soley for informational purposes and is meant to help educate on all the many topics related to energy and the PSC.

Browse by Catagories: Montana Legislature | Alex Epstein Corner | Coal | Hydroelectric | Oil & Gas | Solar, Wind & EV's | Nuclear | Climate Change | Energy Crisis | Ethanol Containing Fuel | Rare Earth Mining | General | Utility Companies | Videos | Power Rates

 

 

Federal judge rules massive Montana coal mine expansion illegal

 

WesternLaw.org

Late Friday, Billings Federal District Court Judge Susan Watters ruled that a massive expansion of the Rosebud coal strip-mine was approved illegally. The expansion was approved in June 2019 by the federal Office of Surface Mining (OSM), and allowed Western Rosebud Mining, LLC (WRM) to strip-mine a new area, known as Area F.

The court ruled that OSM failed to consider the impacts from this massive expansion on water resources, the Yellowstone River, and the climate. The expansion would allow the strip mining of an additional 6,500 acres containing about 70 million tons of coal, which would then be burned almost exclusively at the Colstrip power plant and release over 100 million tons of greenhouse gases. Burning the coal at the Colstrip Power Plant requires diverting 25,000-50,000 acre feet of water from the Yellowstone River each year.

The court agreed with conservation groups who pointed out OSM only focused on economic benefits of the mine but ignored environmental costs. OSM’s attempt to use wordplay to avoid disclosing the overwhelming costs of the mine expansion did not negate its obligation to provide an even-handed analysis of both the costs and benefits of mining coal. On remand, OSM will be obligated to consider a “middle ground” alternative that winds down coal-mining in Colstrip.

“The court found that OSM once again put its thumb on the scale by considering the benefits of the mine but refusing to disclose the on-the-ground impacts that coal mining and burning have on area waters, wildlife, and the climate,” said Melissa Hornbein with the Western Environmental Law Center. “The law doesn’t allow that type of gamesmanship, and the climate and our stressed water resources deserve better.”

“OSM has a responsibility to tell the public the truth about the harm from mining and burning coal. It continually fails to do its job despite the clear language in the law,” said Shiloh Hernandez with Earthjustice. “Under a clear-eyed, honest analysis, continued coal development is indefensible. OSM now has an opportunity and an obligation to lay out and analyze a transition at Colstrip that is just for the community and the climate.”

“This was a massive expansion of strip mining for the Colstrip plant, yet OSM largely ignored the impacts to water resources and how the expansion would contribute to the climate catastrophe that we are experiencing in Montana and across the nation,” said Derf Johnson, deputy director for the Montana Environmental Information Center. “Water is the lifeblood of this state. The mine’s operations as well as the inevitable burning of the coal will cause irreversible harm in Montana and downstream. OSM got caught doing the bidding of the mining industry instead of doing the work of the people.”

 

READ FULL ARTICLE


Published on 10/6/2022 (117 days ago) Coal